Glass Under My Skin

Sunday, June 28, 2009

A Picture Says...


It has been one rainy June. As a matter of fact a lot of the spring has been wet. But the temperature has been mild and the grass has grown long. Though the rain has stopped me from getting into Manhattan and taking street pictures as I like to do but has left me with plenty of time to contemplate buying a new camera.

I usually have two cameras at any give time. A pocketable one and a bigger more sophisticated model. The first big one I ever had was the Olympus OM-G (35mm SLR) which I got back in college. The spring of 1985 I think. I used that one for many years. It’s in a closet somewhere around here now. Good camera.

I didn’t start carrying a pocketable camera for many years after I got my big camera. It was sometime in the early 90’s that I bought a 35mm Olympus Stylus pocket sized camera. I liked that camera. It was not as small as today’s pocketable cameras but it was small enough that I carried it everywhere. My first one was stolen out of my coat pocket in a NYC bar one evening. I usually didn’t carry it in my coat pocket and for sure never did after that. Damned theives. I replaced it though.

Last year I replaced my old pocketable camera (now digital) with a Nikon Coolpix S60. The only reason I wanted that one is the touch screen. I wanted to try that out. It’s been interesting for me to use a camera that meters and focuses where you touch it on screen. Good stuff.

My larger camera is the Nikon Coolpix 8800. I bought it in 2005 and it’s an eight megapixel camera. The Coolpix S60 is a ten megapixel camera. I hate it when my small camera passes my big camera in megapixels. That’s when I start thinking about a new big camera.

I’ve been looking on-line at the latest cameras. There is a lot to choose from. I have stayed away from digital SLRs because I insist on a live view LCD screen. I never want to look through a camera’s view finder again. And I like to shoot at waist level and odd angles so I like the LCD to swivel. The one thing I don’t like about my S60 is that its LCD doesn’t swivel. But that would be hard to do with a touch screen.

These days there are some SLRs (or 4/3 systems) with live view swivel LCD screens. I’ve been checking out some of these but nothing has jumped out at me. They are expensive too. And not as compact as my Coolpix 8800 and other “prosumer” digital cameras.

I take camera reviews with a grain of salt. Whether by amateurs on sites like Amazon or professionals on camera web sites I have no idea what a person’s picture making skill might be. That is an important piece of information that’s missing. Both of my current cameras got mediocre reviews but I like them both. As a matter of fact I like every camera I’ve ever used. I’m sure they exist but I’ve never had a bad camera.

That is because my picture making skills are pretty well developed. After all I draw and paint most of the time so making a picture with a camera is easy compared to making one out of thin air. No insult to the photographic profession but it’s true. That is why there are a lot more photographers than artists.

My background as an artist effects the way I make photos too. I’m less demanding of my camera because my skill is not in taking the picture but in what I make out of it after the picture is taken. A real photographer’s photographer takes total control of his camera and the picture is made in his planning plus knowledge of what his camera can do. There might be some post production work or there might not be. That’s not the kind of photographer I am. To me the photo is raw material for making something interesting.

So advice in a photo review doesn’t always ring true to me. There are some good ones but only about one in three I’d say. And some people just expect their camera to do everything. And do it instantly. One of the criticisms of the Coolpix 8800 was that the zoom was slow. Compared to what? Who knows. And it had one of the biggest zooms in its class at the time so of course it was slower than cameras with zooms half its size. Lots of critics don’t make sense to me.

I’m still not even sure if I really want to replace my Coolpix 8800 yet. Sure there are bigger zooms out there today and more megapixels but I haven’t decided if it’s really worth it. Money is tight these days and even though the cameras I’ve been looking at are cheaper than my Coolpix 8800 was they are still not cheap. It always comes down to money, doesn’t it?

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Comics I Bought This Week: June 25, 2009

I'm back from the comic shop this week and I got one new comic plus a trade paperback collection:

  • Usagi Yojimbo - 121

  • "The Mice Templar: The Prophecy"

  • And now for a review of something I've read recently.

  • "The Amazing Spider-Man: Death and Dating" by Various

  • This volume of Spider-Man was a tough decision for me. I've generally liked the Dan Slott written Spideys that have come out but not the other writers' stuff. Previous volumes have been all Slott or all whoever else they got writing Spidey. Not this one though. We get two Mark Waid, one Marc Guggenheim, one Roger Stern, and three Dan Slot issues.

    Waid is a pretty good writer and I haven't read and Spidey by him yet but his issues were drawn by Marcos Martin who's artwork I'm not thrilled by. I've also liked Roger Stern's writing in the past and his story was drawn by Lee Weeks. That's a plus. Mike McKone drew the rest of the book but I don't really have an opinion about his work one way or the other.

    As I was weighing if I should buy this volume or not what put me over the top was the Shocker. He is one of the first Spider-Man villains I remember and though he was never very interesting nostalgia got the better of me. I loved in whatever Spider-Man issue that was all those years ago when the Shocker was blacking out whole city blocks just so he could spell out his name in skyscrapers when seen from above. That's my crazy kind of villain.

    But enough of my decision making process. The stories in this volume weren't too bad. This book is like a random sampling of current Spider-Man issues. There is no big story line happening in here. We get one and two issue stories of Peter Parker living his life and Spider-Man battling a few low end villains. It was kind of refreshing not to have to read an "event" driven super hero comic.

    So there is not much to say. There is a variety of writers and artists working on this comic but it all hangs together pretty well. Nothing spectacular but I'm glad I ended up buying it because it was an enjoyable read. Pick it up if you want a sampling of the talent that has been bringing us Spider-man lately.

    Sunday, June 21, 2009

    Chain Lightning


    Things that will make you go blind: Making chain mail.

    Once upon a time I got it into my head to make chain mail. My cousin George had made small piece and it looked cool. One day soon after I was bored and decided I wanted to figure out how to make it and I had the internet to tell me that it's really not hard.

    What you need is some 16 gauge steel wire, a quarter inch dowel, and wire cutters. First you wrap the steel wire tightly around the dowel. When you are done with this the wire looks like a spring. You pull the wire off the dowel and snip it with the cutters at the top of each loop. This is how you make all the little metal rings that you need to weave together. You'll need a lot of them.

    Weaving it all together is the hardest part. You have to follow a pattern where each ring is looped through four others on each side of it. That can be a little tricky but you can get the hang of it. It's almost like knitting. Or weaving.

    But what drives you blind is that it is all close up work. I'm used to close up work being that I draw and paint but there is a difference. When drawing or painting I move in and out of the work. I have to step back every now and again to get an overall look and then move in close to work on details. The key to avoiding eye strain in not to concentrate on the details for too long. I stare off into the distance as a matter of habit. It's good to have a window to work by.

    The problem with making chain mail is that there is no moving in and out of it. It's pure detail work. Up close and making sure that every ring attaches correctly. Make a mistake and you have to go back. Plus they are little quarter inch across rings. Not easy to work with.

    With chain mail you also can't work by feel. My mother knits and crochets but doesn't have to be looking at all the little loops she's making. When the needles are flying along it's all done by feel. You can move your vision in and out. Looking sometimes to make sure things are going as they should and then not looking as you make a bunch of loops of yarn. With chain mail you have to watch every ring go into place. Up close and personal.

    I ended up making two pieces of chain mail. Both were about three inch wide bracelets. Not very big in the grand scheme of things. The first was an all steel model but with the second I got fancy and used brass to make some of the rings. This way I had two colors to work with. I just gotta have color. That was a mistake.

    Since brass is considerably softer than steel the brass rings pulled apart. Soon after I finished the bracelet some of the brass rings bent open a little and the rings connected to them slipped out of place. Rings started shifting everywhere and the thing became a mess. So if you want to make your own my advice is to stick with steel.

    But I gave up making chain mail after those two small bracelets. It was too demanding on my eyes. They hurt right now just thinking about it. And though I have all the patience in the world when making art I have no such patience for making craft. That and I had no real reason to make anything out of chain mail. I was satisfied with figuring out how to make those small bits of chain mail.

    About a year after I made this chain mail a coworker of mine expressed an interest in learning to make chain mail. He wanted a chain shirt to wear to a Renaissance festival he frequented, was a hands on crafty guy, and so was looking to make his own. I warned him off telling of my chain mail experience and of how long it would take to make and entire shirt. After all it took me a few hours to make each bracelet.

    He ended up abandoning his quest to make chain mail and found a nice chain mail shirt on Ebay for a very reasonable price. Neither of us even knew that such chain mail shirts could be found so easily. Or so cheaply. I think he paid about eighty bucks for the thing in 2002 or so. He was quite happy not to have spent many hours figuring out how to make a chain mail shirt. Or to make himself go blind. I like not going blind.

    Thursday, June 18, 2009

    Comics I Bought This Week: June 18, 2009

    I'm back from the comic shop this week and I got twelve new comics plus a hard cover collection:

  • Fear Agent 13-20 (some on sale back issues)

  • Mysterious the Unfathomable - 6

  • Ex Machina - 43

  • The Trial of Thor - 1

  • Rex Mundi - 18

  • The Starman Omnibus Volume 3

  • And now for a review of something I've read recently.

  • "The Incredible Hercules - Love and War" with writing by Fred Pak and Fred Van Lente and art by Clayton Henry and Salva Espin

  • I forgot I bought this book. I bought the hardcover collection when it came out, put it on the shelf next to the other Hercules volumes and promptly forgot about it. I saw the softcover copy in my local comic shop and couldn't remember purchasing the hardcover one. I went home to look on my shelf and there it was. Weird.

    Much like the other Hercules volumes this book is fun. In this book we get more of the Marvel Universe versions of Greek gods. They are a violent and dysfunctional family and this current run of Hercules brings them more to life than any Marvel version I've seen before.

    In this story we also get Marvel's version of the Amazons. I'm not sure if they've appeared before but here they are mythical super warriors who don't like Hercules or men in general for that matter.

    What follows is a pretty decent super hero/Greek god adventure. This may have even been the best of the Hercules volumes. They are not great or insightful stories but they are fun ones. The art is solid and so is the coloring. So if you're in the mood for a fun comic check this one out.

    Sunday, June 14, 2009

    A Chair Full of Woe


    So far I don’t like my new drafting chair. It may be a lemon. I wish I could have fixed my old drafting chair but alas in this disposable world of ours that was not to be. My old chair was really good. I bought it sometime in the early Nineties and it lasted me about fifteen years. I paid a lot of money for it. Four hundred dollars as I remember. An especially big sum for me back then.

    The chair was by Martin Universal Designs and was solid and reliable. I usually work standing and only sit about ten to twenty percent of the time. That means I need a drafting chair for its height. A regular desk chair is way too short. That chair could adjust the seat height and pitch, the chair back height and angle. I even paid the extra money for adjustable arms. It was a good chair. Too bad it’s gone.

    What finally broke on it was a weight bearing bolt under the seat. The seat pitched back and forth freely without that bolt to steady it. If it was a regular bolt I could have replaced it easily but it was a specialty bolt. It had a hole in the middle of it for a lever to pass through and was threaded in a couple of places to secure it. Not a common item.

    I searched the internet in vain for drafting chair parts. I only found a couple of places that had exorbitantly priced parts for chairs. And none of them were even the part I needed. I remembered the art supply store Sam Flax used to fix drafting chairs but that was in the Nineties. And that was also in Manhattan. Plus the store closed. Not much help to me.

    So I made the decision to get a new chair. I bought the last one at Pearl Paint in Paramus NJ all those years ago but I didn’t want to go over there to get one this time. The internet offers a wider variety of things these days and competitive pricing. Art supplies are notoriously over priced. I’ve been trying to save some money and didn’t want to spend a lot on a new chair. But my aching back said I better get one fast.

    I searched high and low on the internet and discovered that drafting chairs are in pretty short supply these days. I guess that not a lot of drafting at an old fashioned drafting table gets done these days. Everything is done on computer and in a lower computer chair. The height is not necessary.

    I also discovered that the quality of drafting chairs, much like other pieces of drafting equipment, had diminished over the years. I could tell just by the pictures. Sure you can buy a $1000 high end drafting chair but the quality $300-$400 dollar ones, like my old one, were no where to be seen. Plenty of places has $200 chairs for $400 dollars but I’m no dummy. I can comparison shop. It’s easy on the internet.

    My back was hurting from standing too much and I was in dismay from not being able to find a good chair. I checked a few local office supply stores but they had nothing good. So I hit the internet again. This time I was able to find a couple of places that sold chairs by Martin Universal Designs. They made my old chair that I liked so much so I decided to get one of these new ones. I could tell it wasn’t as good as my old one because the seat didn’t have tilt control. But few I saw did. As a matter of fact I don’t remember any.

    One site had the chair priced lowest at about $140 with a small amount for shipping. Since it was the same manufacturer as my old chair I decided to order it. Even if it was of lesser quality. After all, most of the drafting chairs these days were of lesser quality.

    The chair arrived a couple of days later and I easily assembled it. I was clearly of lesser quality than my old one (and didn’t have the same part I needed to repair the old one) but I hoped it would do. Unfortunately as soon as I put it together and went to adjust the angle of the back a lever came right off in my hand. A bad weld that didn’t hold.

    A vice-grip wrench used instead of the lever made a suitable replacement and I was able to adjust the back to my liking. Still I was perturbed. A brand new chair should not have bad welds like that. I paid good money for it.

    I went back on the web site and wend through their “broken product complaint” section and sent them a message about the problem. I did as I was told and described the part that was broken including the part number. And then didn’t hear back for three weeks.

    I was annoyed but my aching back needed the chair, which was perfectly sit-able despite the broken lever, and I was also anxious about how I would return the whole chair. You see once those pneumatic tubes snap into place they don’t came apart. I couldn’t disassemble the chair to put it in the box to return it.

    I finally heard from the returns department and they wanted pictures of what was broken. Being an artist/graphics guy/photographer this was easy for me. I worked up a photo with text and arrows describing my problem. And then I didn’t hear back. Annoying but the chair was still sit-able. My back liked it.

    This week a new problem with the chair emerged. The pneumatic tube which sits in the middle of the base of the chair is not supposed to go all the way to the ground. But guess what. Now it does. It, in fact, dropped lower than the wheels. I had to pound on the base of the chair with great force to get it to move a bit so that the tube wasn’t dragging the floor. Now after sitting in it for a few days it’s back to the floor.

    So today I called the place about this lemon of a chair. I spoke to a very nice woman about my problem and she ended up passing everything on to the returns department which she said was in a bit of disarray since they just expanded (nice to hear of new hirings though). That’s why I may have fallen through the cracks. I’m supposed to hear back from them soon. We’ll have to see. The chair is still sit-able but I don’t know for how long. I sure miss my old reliable chair.

    Thursday, June 11, 2009

    Comics I Bought This Week: June 11, 2009

    I'm back from the comic shop this week and I got four new comics plus two trade paperbacks and a hard cover collection. Quite a haul this week:

  • Mysterious the Unfathomable - 3

  • Walking Dead - 62

  • Savage Dragon - 149

  • Buffy Season Eight Tales of the Vampires - 1

  • Young Liars Volume 1 - "Daydream Believer"

  • Young Liars Volume 2 - "Maestro"

  • Conan Volume 7 "Cimmeria"


  • And now for a review of something I've read recently.

  • "Apocalypse Nerd" Issues 1-6 by Peter Bagge

  • I read this series as it came out a couple of years ago but this is the first time I've sat down and read all the issues together.

    "Apocalypse Nerd" has a fairly simple premise. A couple of buddies, one a computer guy (the nerd of the title) and the other a kind of fringe low level drug dealer loser, are coming home from camping in the mountains outside of Seattle when they find out the city has been nuked. The rest of the comic is them trying to survive out in the post apocalyptic woods.

    This comic is the definition of dark comedy. It might, in fact, just be dark. Sure it's drawn in Bagge's comical style and there are jokes in it but some of the things our protagonists due to survive are downright disturbing.

    This comic is filled with death, destruction, anarchy, and jokes. Reading it all together it reminded me a little of "The Walking Dead". It had that same dramatic but depressing quality without the zombies. And more comedy.

    These comics also have backup stories unrelated to the main stories. The backups are about the USA's founding fathers and are played for comedy but Bagge is clearly a fan of history.

    The stories are all about the personal and political differences between the various characters who formed our country. There is not much awe and reverence to be found here. I am also a history fan so I recognized most of the interpersonal conflicts he was writing about and he does a good job with them.

    "Apocalypse Nerd" was definitely my favorite thing that Peter Bagge has done in a while. Not that he's done a lot. The backups are a lot of fun if you're a history buff but beware how dark the main story is. It's good though.

    Sunday, June 07, 2009

    A Question of Movies


    Here is a question I've always wondered about the answer to. Why are so many of the critics "Best Movies Ever" such downers? Seriously. Look at all the lists. At least half of most lists are depressing films.

    I'd define a downer as any movie I would watch and then say to myself (who else would listen), "The world sure is a screwed up place". It doesn't have to be as depressing as the 1984 version of 1984 and it can even have exciting parts but over all it points out how screwed up life is.

    The Godfather and The Godfather Part II are both downers. Sure they're great movies but depressing. You don't put them on for a pick me up. They take an emotional commitment to watch.

    Citizen Kane - downer.

    Casablanca - downer despite the slightly hopeful ending.

    Lawrence of Arabia - downer that is epic in scope but still a downer.

    Raging Bull - downer. Even chooses to use black and white so it's extra depressing.

    Sunset Boulevard - downer. The story is told by a dead man. Classic downer move.

    Gone with the Wind - I've never seen it but it take place during the U.S. Civil War on a busted up southern plantation doesn't it? That has to be a downer. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    Chinatown - downer. Everyone is corrupt!

    There are plenty more on critics "Best Films" lists but those are ones that dominate top ten lists. At least when the public gets to vote "Star Wars" and "Raiders of the Lost Ark" can break into the top ten. Not my favorites but at least they are fun and not downers.

    Could you imagine if the "Best Of" lists in other areas were dominated by downers. If someone's "Top Ten" song list was dominated by depressing songs we would all think there was something wrong with them. A top ten list of blues songs has fewer downers than a top ten list of movies.

    How about a top ten list of TV shows? I would guess three to five shows on anyone's list would be comedies. What top TV show list doesn't have I Love Lucy, M.A.S.H., Cheers, Seinfeld, or your favorite comedy on it? Comedies are rarely high on critics "Best Movies Ever" lists unless it's a Marx Brothers movie from eighty years ago. Sometimes they sneak on.

    Even the dramas on TV are usually less depressing than any of the movies I've mentioned. I don't like medical dramas but lots of people do and as depressing as they may get they are equally hopeful. If not more so.

    If someone's top ten paintings, pieces of art, or just general images are depressing we'd sign them up for psychiatrist. Just ask all those Goth kids who like to wear black and display images that remind us of death. Who doesn't think they're a little nutty. But film critics; they get a pass.

    I think it's because film critics were for so long wanting films to be taken seriously and treated as art that they wanted no frivolity in their "Best Of" lists. It's part of film critic culture now. In order for a film critic to be taken seriously he has to talk about serious films that take themselves seriously. Humor need not apply.

    I think we need a name for this syndrome. And we have to get these critics some psychological help. They're looking pretty depressed to me.

    This line of thinking had me reevaluating my favorite movies too. Not that I have an actual list but I took of my serious critic dark tinted glasses. Now if the discussion comes up I pick "Smokey and the Bandit" as the best movie ever. There’s a fun film romp that always entertains me.

    Thursday, June 04, 2009

    Comics I Bought This Week: June 4, 2009

    I'm back from the comic shop this week and I got no new comics but I did get a hard cover collection:

  • "Hulk: Red and Green" Volume 2


  • And now for a review of something I've read recently.

  • "The Invincible Iron Man: Five Nightmares" by Matt Fraction and Salvdore Larrocca

  • I haven't checked in on any "Iron Man" comics in a long while. I've liked Matt Fraction's writing on "Iron Fist" so I decided to check out his work in this collection.

    This relaunch of Iron Man ties the book in more closely with the movie but since the movie was pretty close to the old Iron Man comics I've read it really didn't take a lot. Tony Stark (Iron Man's alter ego) is the head of Marvel's spy agency and still running his own giant technology company. The son of a former Iron Man enemy decides he wants to kill Tony Stark and his company.

    The first few issues of this story were a little bleak. That's when the villain of the piece, Ezekiel Stane, starts his campaign of super terrorism against the world. He sends guy out to blow themselves and others up with super bombs. Stark isn't sure how to stop him. But eventually he does and that's the story.

    I generally liked the story. It was a downer at first and had a little too much "The world isn't the same old man" stuff in it for my taste but I liked the plot and script.

    I found the artwork just so-so. Some of it was good but some of it fell flat. Once again the coloring let me down. The colorists were going for a illustrative realism and it didn't work. Muddy skin tones and "realism" where it wasn't called for by the pencils bogged it down for me. Not horrible artwork but not A level either.

    All in all this was an okay book. I enjoyed the writing more then the art but they played together pretty well. Check it out if you want to catch up on the world of Tony Stark.